August 18, 2010

Yes here we go again! Same-sex marriage is the topic! But it's more than that. The courts are really extending their reach into the distinctions between the sexes, which, if you read some of the rulings of late that affect gender roles and rights, there is no distinction.

Forget genitalia of either gender, it doesn't matter. We are all the same. Too bad someone hasn't come up with a way for a man to bare children, ah, but wait, we have the transgendered female-to-male is just gave birth to, wait for it, a hermaphrodite some four month ago.

I am not here to discuss that little ditty, except to say, both mother (or should I say "birth-father") and child are in a protected class with extra civil rights protection from any bullying or name-calling.

I will direct your attention, however, to historical fact that the left's passionate support for what is considered the most radical change in this -- and all previous -- societies, brings with it the actual result of the elimination of male and female. They go about it this way: the redefinition of marriage from male-female to include male-male and female-female basically says that two humans can get married. That's it! No gender needed!

Now, from Moses to Hesiod, from Thucydides and Aristotle to Gaius the Platonist and from Jesus and Mohammed to the 1970's, marriage was regarded as the building block of society.  It was Plutarch who once said that changing its nature will change society.

Each of these "Jewish, Greek and Roman philosophers tell the world that marriage has and always was between man and woman. Granted several civilizations allowed for polygamy and a few polyandry, but marriage always was between the sexes. Now comes and "Brave New World."

Our courts today, or more especially the far-left society (comprising about 14 percent of the population of the United States) is saying, among other things, that same-sex marriage means that because sex (now called "gender") no longer matters for society's most important institution, it no longer matters in general.

Men and women as distinct entities no longer have significance. Which is exactly what the cultural left and the gay rights movement advocate -- even though the vast majority of Americans who support same-sex marriage do not realize that this is what they are supporting. Most Americans who support same-sex marriage feel (and "feel" is the crucial verb here, as the change to same-sex marriage is much more felt than thought through) that gays should have the right to marry a member of their own sex. It is perceived as unfair to gays that they cannot do so. And that is true. It is unfair to gays.

But the price paid for eliminating this unfairness is enormous: It is the end of marriage as every society has known it. And it is more than that. It is the end of any significance to gender. Men and women are now declared interchangeable. That is why, as I noted in a recent column -- the "T" has been added to "GLB:" "Transgendered" has been added to "Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual." "T" does not represent transsexuals -- people who choose to change their sex. No one is arguing against such people. "Transgendered" refers to people who are members of one sex and who wish to publicly act as if they are members of the other sex, e.g., men wearing women's clothing in public. The transgendered who publicly act out are living the cultural Left's primary agenda: rendering gender insignificant. Your sex is what you feel it is; and if you feel both, you are both. Gender doesn't matter.

That is why Judge Walker and his supporters dismiss the argument that, all things being equal, it is better for children to be raised by a married man and woman than by two men or two women. If Walker or GLBT activists and their supporters admitted that children need a mother and father, they would be affirming that there is great significance to the differences between men and women.

They reject that. Instead, they and Walker offer studies that purport to prove that it makes no difference whether or not a child has parents of both sexes. These academic studies are as unserious as all those academic studies of a generation ago that "proved" that boys do not prefer to play with trucks and soldiers but would be just as happy to play with dolls and tea sets, and that girls do not prefer dolls and tea sets but would be just as happy to play with trucks and soldiers.

These newer "studies" of same-sex parents are as valid as the earlier propaganda in the guise of scientific studies. Like the boy-girl studies, these were conducted by academics with agendas: the denial of male-female differences and the promotion of same-sex marriage. That many Americans believe these studies -- studies that are in any case based on a small number of same-sex couples raising a small number of children, during a short amount of time (a couple of decades), based on the researchers' own notions of what a healthy and successful young person is -- only proves how effectively colleges and graduate schools have succeeded in teaching a generation of Americans not to think critically but to accept "studies" in place of common sense.

Ask anyone who supports same-sex marriage this: Do you believe that a mother has something unique to give to a child that no father can give and that a father has something unique to give a child that no mother can give?

One has to assume that most people -- including supporters of same-sex marriage -- would respond in the affirmative. How, then, can they support same-sex marriage? The left's trinity -- compassion, fairness and equality -- is one reason. And "studies" and "facts" are another.

That is exactly how so many college graduates came to believe that boys would be happy with tea sets, and girls would be happy with trucks -- compassion, fairness, equality and "studies." That is also how many Americans, including a judge who overturned a state's constitutional amendment, have come to believe that never having a mother or never having a father makes absolutely no difference to a child.

And if mothers and fathers are interchangeable, men as men and women as women lose their significance.

It's little wonder that society is lost for when we lose our identity as male and female, we lose our personhood and all else is just plan "equal."

We believe that the Constitution of the United States speaks for itself. There is no need to rewrite, change or reinterpret it to suit the fancies of special interest groups or protected classes.