May 1, 2014

Progressives and the entire far-left have already branded me a "racist." When asked why, the answers ranged from simple disagreeing with the President's policies, to having not voting for him in either election.

Well I disagreed with about 80 percent of George Bush's policies and didn't vote for him in 2004. (I wasn't converted to the Constitution Party until 2003 and in 2000 I was content merely to vote against Al Gore.) Does that make me a reverse racist?

Pure and simple, I disagree whole-heartedly and with my entire soul with socialism, communism and anti-Americanism. That basically means I officially disagree with and loathe What the entire Democratic Party has become. And the leader of the party is a socialist, a communist and very anti-American.

On Tuesday, Republicans charged that an email in which a White House official advises former U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice to link the 2012 Benghazi attack to an anti-Muslim video confirms the linkage was fabricated to help President Barack Obama's re-election.

Sen. Lindsey Graham told FOX news and several other news outlets that "this email is a smoking gun", the proof showing "political operatives in the White House working to create a political narrative at odds with the facts."

Graham was correct to say that the Administration's  goal was not to tell the truth about what actually happened because they did not want to provide the best information available.

We were provided the most beneficial political story for President Obama. We were given a reason not to think Obama had anything to do with the Benghazi mess therefore we have no reason not to vote for him.

New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte told Greta Van Susteren: "We always said, 'Where did the video reference come from?' Now we know it came from the White House" and not the intelligence community.

Both Graham and Ayotte are members of the Senate Armed Services Committee. They have been among the many Republicans who have called for an independent investigation of the attacks on Sept. 11, 2012, that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, including two former Navy SEALS.

Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe, the panel's ranking GOP member says this was "a cover-up, and these e-mails only continue to confirm my belief."

The email, dated Sept. 14, 2012, was among more than 100 pages of documents released by Judicial Watch on Tuesday. It shows White House Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes advising Rice, who now is Obama's national security adviser, to focus on the YouTube video as the cause of a spontaneous protest that led to the attack.

But previously released emails show senior defense officials told the administration on the night of the attack that it was terrorism linked to al-Qaida and that no protest had occurred.

Rhodes outlined several talking points for Rice, with the advice "to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy."

The email was prepared for a Sept. 15 "prep call" with Rice that was to occur at 4 p.m., according to the document. The following day, five days after the attack, Rice appeared on five Sunday talk shows, each time linking the Libyan attacks to the anti-Muslim video.

Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton cited the same reason for the attacks, while Obama would not say whether it was terrorism until several days afterward.

Former CIA deputy director Mike Morell testified earlier this month that he had no idea where the story about a video protest came from when he saw Rice make the claim on television.

The other Americans killed in the attacks on the U.S. consulate and adjacent CIA annex were Sean Smith and two former Navy SEALs, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods.

Judicial Watch obtained the documents on April 18 via a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit it filed against the State Department last June, said President Tom Fitton. The group obtained 41 emails, many of which had portions redacted.

Fitton commented on the emails by saying that we now know beyond a doubt that the Obama White House's chief concern over the Benghazi attack was making sure that President Obama "looked good."

These documents undermine the Obama administration's narrative that it thought the Benghazi attack had something to do with protests or an Internet video," he said. "Given the explosive material in these documents, it is no surprise that we had to go to federal court to pry them loose from the Obama State Department."

Some of the top White House officials who received the Rhodes memo were White House Press Secretary Jay Carney; Deputy Press Secretary Joshua Earnest; then-White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer; then-White House Deputy Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri; then-National Security Council Director of Communications Erin Pelton; Special Assistant to the Press Secretary Howli Ledbetter; and then-White House Senior Adviser and political strategist David Plouffe.

In her interview with Van Susteren, Ayotte said the email made it clear that the focus of the "prep call" was to ensure that Obama, who was less than two months away from a tight re-election bid, looked like a strong leader rather than try to get out the facts on the attacks as they were known.

Further, since both Carney and Plouffe were among the email's recipients, it can be assumed they read it and were aware of the story that Rice was going to tell.

There is another troubling thing here. In the email was a reference for Rice to make sure to mention that al-Qaida had been destroyed. Even Sen. Ayotte said this was nowhere in the talking points, and actually it's contradicted by what we know happened on that day.

This administration must be held accountable to telling the truth so that we can find closure, bring our attackers to justice, and prevent future attacks. But is probably won't happen since the media and a whole host of far-left Alinskyites have a propaganda machine second to none, including the Nazis.

The Obama administration made up a story out of whole cloth to deceive the American people and to try to make the president look good. Whether lying about Obamacare, and now lying about Benghazi, this administration has no decency. Richard Nixon couldn't even begin to hold a candle to this Administration.

The far-left's concern for making President Obama into a saint, a Messiah, God-Almighty - without flaw or error, is how they think they can get away with calling Obama's critics "racists." What the Progressives really want to say is that disagreeing with Obama on anything, at anytime, is blasphemy. But "blasphemy" may be deemed too religious a term for anti-religious communists.

Go ahead, call me a "racist." After all, sticks and stones.... Obama is a liar and I wouldn't trust him any farther than I can throw the White House. He has got to go. But I won't hold my breath that anything will ever come of this "Smoking Gun."